By José Pardo-Tomás, Institución Milá y Fontanals-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
Louis-Jean-Charles Maulny (1758-1815) was a lawyer, naturalist and collector from Le Mans, owner of a cabinet of curiosities, whose collections were acquired after his death (1816) by the town’s museum, created in 1799 (fig. 1). A substantial part of the natural history specimens and objects from Maulny’s cabinet are now kept in the Musée Vert (Natural History Museum of Le Mans), while some archaeological and antiquities pieces are kept in the history and archaeology museum called Musée Jean Claude Boulard-Carré Plantagenêt.
However, the future project for the municipal museums of Le Mans envisages the reunification of the archaeological-historical and naturalistic collections of the city, so somehow Maulny will see what remains of the collections of what was once his cabinet of curiosities reintegrated into a single exhibition. Thanks to the excellent hosting of Nicolas Morel, always willing to act as an attentive mediator, I had the opportunity to talk to some of the people involved in this new museum project, including Morel himself. Everything seems to indicate that the challenge of reuniting these municipal museums will produce interesting results, both in terms of Museology and historical research in cultural heritage and scientific collecting.

Louis Maulny was the great-grandson of a master apothecary, François Maulny, active in the second half of the 17th century; his grandfather and his father left this guild and artisan, albeit wealthy, estate to study law and rise to the so-called provincial noblesse de robe which opened the doors of the institutions of local government to them as “conseillers du roi au siège présidial du Mans”. Coming from this social status, Louis acquired his first education in his home town with the Oratorians, who gave him his first informal introduction to botany and zoology. Then he was sent to study law in Toulouse; but there he devoted himself more eagerly to the collection of minerals and the study of natural history than to the laws of an Ancien Régime which had very little left of their validity.
His family’s more than comfortable position allowed him to develop his collector’s passion. However, from the age of thirty and for the twenty-six years that remained of his life, Maulny had to live through the turbulent years between the French Revolution and the Bourbon Restoration. Maulny was able to navigate with great skill amidst the political changes and the violent clashes between royalists and revolutionaries, between republicans themselves, between opponents and those convinced (or resigned) to the Bonapartist rise and, finally, the pro-Bourbon conspirators supported by all the European powers. His presence was continuous among the advisors and experts at La Sarthe appointed by the always changing central power in Paris to participate in the rescue of artistic and cultural property expropriated from aristocrats and ecclesiastics or saved from the destruction and pillage of the riots and uprisings thanks to the nationalisation decreed by the republican authorities. So, it is not difficult to understand that he took advantage of the situation to enhance his own collections. As Marianne Thauré wrote in 1999, referring to Maulny: “It is therefore very difficult to reconcile the goodwill of the naturalist, the passion of the collector and the exaltation of the citizen proud of his mission”.
Among the numerous objects of all kinds that Maulny had collected during his lifetime and which at his death passed – through purchase – to swell the public heritage of his city, there were paintings, sculptures, coins, medals, minerals, fossils, stuffed animals and “curiosities”, specimens from the three kingdoms of nature which, because of their provenance, their appearance or their essence, he had deemed worthy of being kept among his treasures.

Subsequently, the municipal authorities and their expert consultants decided to divide the city’s public collections into different sections, creating one devoted to the fine arts, another to archaeology and a third devoted to natural history, which was largely forgotten during a long period of “artist” directors and curators. Such a division, carried out according to an economy of knowledge and disciplinary taxonomies, no longer belonged to Maulny’s time, but to those who came after him. These were times in which an exhibition regime typical of nineteenth-century museums triumphed, which – although its antecedents can be traced back to the turbulent years of the end of the Ancien Régime – would take shape in the second half of the century and would last until at least the Interwar period. In short, an exhibition regime which – like all of them – was marked by a certain normativity in its relationship with the public, a scale of prestige for the different disciplines and conditions for the production of knowledge that bore little resemblance to those Maulny knew during his lifetime.
The vicissitudes of Maulny’s cabinet, as far as natural history is concerned, show us – once again – that there was no linear and univocal transition from cabinets of curiosities to natural history museums, despite what the official narrative of history of many European and American museums continues to claim. As usual, history is more complex and therefore much more interesting. There were a thousand and one ways of forming a museum and a thousand and one ways of ending up with a cabinet of curiosities. And almost none of them move from one to the other in a simple or inevitable way.


The collections that today make up the Musée Vert in Le Mans are an eloquent example of this. And the pieces that come from Louis Maulny’s former cabinet of curiosities are no less eloquent a case of how there are many ways to get to a natural history museum from a cabinet of curiosities.
Bibliography
Paul Delaunay, “Louis Maulny, naturaliste et collectionneur (1758-1815). Ses amis, son temps, ses successeurs”, Bulletin de la Société d’agriculture, sciences et arts de la Sarthe, 60, 1945: 1-132.
Déborah Dubald, Capital nature: a history of French municipal museums of natural history, 1795-1870, Florence, European University Institute PhD theses, 2019.
Ambroise Gentil, “Louis Maulny, naturaliste manceau”, Bulletin de la Société d’agriculture, sciences et arts de la Sarthe, 35, 1912: 293-308.
Pierre‐Yves Lacour, La République naturaliste. Collections d’histoire naturelle et Révolution française (1789‐1804), Paris, Publications scientifiques du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, 2014.
OpenEdition suggests that you cite this post as follows:
Nathalie Richard (January 6, 2023). Maulny and Le Mans: one of a thousand ways of moving from the cabinet of curiosities to the natural history museum. SciCoMove — Scientific Collections on the Move. Retrieved April 26, 2025 from https://doi.org/10.58079/twto
One thought on “Maulny and Le Mans: one of a thousand ways of moving from the cabinet of curiosities to the natural history museum”